
Clinician Perspectives on the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Decision-Making Process
This qualitative study explores how clinicians determine candidacy for venovenous ECMO in severe respiratory failure. Interviews with 24 clinicians across 9 countries revealed that decisions rely heavily on subjective judgment rather than standardized criteria. Factors such as age, BMI, ventilator duration, social context, and institutional resources vary widely in interpretation. Cognitive biases and ethical considerations further influence decisions, leading to inconsistent and potentially inequitable allocation of this life-saving but resource-intensive therapy.
